Civil Liberties

The 2006 case, coupled States v. Jones, revisited a very important publish that has been and continues to be difficult to manoeuvre as the interpretation judge cover everlastingly changes with our constantly changing world. In 2008 Antoine Jones was sentenced to look in prisons for conspiracy to pass around and to possess with intent to propagate five or more kilograms of cocaine and 50 or more grams of cocaine base. The United States v. K nonts, on which the prosecutors relied, helped validate the usance of somewhat of data obtained from the GPS trailing thingummy. In the appeal that resulted in overturn of Jones conviction, it argued that although, in Knotts,(a) soul traveling in an travel on public thoroughfares has no reasonable expectancy of privacy in his movements from one locating to another, this does not express to movements whatsoever. In Knotts, the defendant was track from point A to B (100 mile), whereas Jones was tracked 24 hours a day for 4 weeks . Beca example some lawcourts deemed the use of a GPS tracking device not a search  therefore not a violation of the stern amendment and the court of appeals did, immediate clearing was needed. In 2011 the US haughty Court grant the appeal for Writ of Certiorari, which is a put down that a losing party files with the overbearing Court asking the lordly Court to review the conclusion of a lower court. In this documents, it presented the question Whether the warrantless use of a tracking device on respondents vehicle to admonisher its movements on public streets break the fourth amendments.  \nTo protect citizens against electronic intrusion in places a one would consider private, the Harlans reasonable-expectation-of-privacy raise was employed, booting out the previous common-law(predicate) trespassory test. This has created a path of hazard for law enforcement to physically and technically trespass on ones prop if deemed person had no expectation of privacy . In summary, th...