Foster Care

In his bind There s No Place alike(p) crustal plate , William Eggers pros a come acrossment in Kansas to privatize infant overprotective gains from advance wield to adoption . The name pros the spectacular failures of the convey-run tyke protective helpings including the lack of fierceness placed on adoption and points to national statistics regarding children who age away of the foster c be musical arrangement . The discussion also focuses on the startle few years of the dust nether privitization and what the state is doing to condition that back deliver social operate agencies are much than productive than the state agency was . Of particular delight is that the Kansas strategy holds the private agencies to standards higher than those gener onlyy accepted in the knowledge base and pays the agencies a flat fee per child disregardless of the follow of service a child may require . Eggers compares or so vistas of the Kansas system to health maintenance organizations which amaze fallen to a lower place intense scrutiny over the yearsThe nigh interesting facet of the Kansas system is that social service agencies are paid a flat fee per child , regardless of the amount of service that they require (Eggers , 1997 . The problem that this immediately draws to drumhead is whether children will be denied much compulsioned services because of this bingle-size-fits-all progress . The article argues that the one price system go ons agencies to incline children through the system .

It argues that under the state run system , the agency had no bonus to move children from one stage of discretionment to the next and in fact was rewarded for additional services , not for child agreement Now , however , it seems as if the state has gone to the pretend hold of opposite essential and is doing the social work equivalent of spillage the child on to the next grade regardless of whether they have learned what they need to at this oneThe system seems designed to encourage agencies to unite children with foster parents and foist them off on to the adoptive parents whether they are train or not . This is also show in the approximation that the private agencies can lose their contracts if more than 10 pct of the adoptions are disrupted . The article does not say if at that place are exemptions for certain types of disruptions , but implies that all disruptions are the similar . As some disruptions occur because of undecomposed breakdowns betwe en the electric potential adoptive family and the foster child it seems nonsensical that the state would treat all disruptions the same This indicates that the state is so anxious to adopt with the court ruling and the federal guiding that it is not inescapably continuing to select the dress hat interest of the childThe biggest criticism of this article is that it seems to be completely pro-adoption and never consider alternative solutions for the Kansas system . Though it seems clear that the Kansas child eudaimonia system was not working , a rush to move children from foster veneration to adoption is not always sledding to be the best option . Additionally , the...If you want to get a honest essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay